How happy I am that SUBJECT: RE: is now on sale, I was also disappointed when I saw that the publisher has put a stamp that says ‘Chicklit Asli Buatan Indonesia’ on the cover, without my knowledge.
I’ve got to make it clear that I have nothing against chicklit, I do love Bridget Jones’ Diary and Shopaholic Series, but this book is definitely couldn’t fall into this genre.
This is a definition of chicklit from
The Free Dictionary:
“Chick lit is a slightly uncomplimentary term used to denote popular fiction written for and marketed to young women, especially single young women in their 20s, working in the business world. It was spurred on (if not exactly created) in the mid-1990s by the appearance of Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones's Diary, Melissa Banks's The Girl's Guide to Hunting and Fishing, and The Nanny Diaries by Emma McLaughlin and Nicola Krause. The genre tends to feature lonely young women in urban settings, often working in the publishing industry; it may also be considered a subdivision of the romance genre. The favored style is hip, stylish, bold, self-analytical, and slightly irreverent. Sexuality may be a primary or secondary theme but is always present, and often is presented as adventuresome, as in Candace Bushnell's Sex and the City and the television series it spawned.”
And this one is from
BookReporter:
"Chick Lit focuses on twentysomething and thirtysomething women who are dealing with that time in life when a woman looks for the perfect guy, apartment, job or, yes, shoe. Along the way these women question everything from the way they were raised to the the quality of their lives. The characters typically are either self-deprecating or overly analytical. At its best the writing is witty, bold and slightly irreverent."
On the other hand, SUBJECT: RE: features 2 characters, a man and a woman, in a very much the same portion. The woman herself is not single anymore and even has a kid. The writing style is never meant to be hip nor witty. Most of all, the story is not dealing on everyday life but more on the deeper issue of life.
We can refer to the paperback comments to see what the readers think about this book and I have received many comments that this book is far too serious to be taken as a chicklit.
When confronted, my publisher argued that the stamp is merely a marketing gimmick to put my book on the front display in bookstores. I have to say: What the fuck? I really believe that we should put books under their right genres, not to differentiate them, but to make it easier for readers to find their reading materials.
Putting a book under the wrong genre is a big mistake in marketing strategy. With the chiklit stamp on its cover, my book has lost some of its target reader. The ones who bought it -hoping for a light reading- might get disappointed upon its content. This is why I refused hard that my book be put under this genre.
We finally agreed that the next printings wouldn’t have the chicklit stamp on the cover, and I’m free to make an explanation whenever I want. But still, I have to admit that I’m really really disappointed.
Comments?
PS:
I don’t agree either that the words memek, kontol, ngewi, fuck, and fucking should be censored by the publisher. I mean, this book is talking about 2 adults having a sexual affair and even have a picture of condom in it, why should we be afraid to say (or read) those words?
But the publisher explained that the censorship is necessary to make sure that my book won’t get rejected by some bookstores. Under this circumstances, I should make myself agree to the censorship.